Naar inhoud
Terug naar Knowledge Catalog
Netherlands

Article 7:690 Dutch Civil Code – Temporary-Agency Employment Contract

Gepubliceerd op:

Article 7:690 BW defines the temporary-agency employment contract as an employment contract in which an employer, acting as part of its profession or business, makes an employee available to a third party. The employee then works under the third party’s supervision and direction pursuant to an assignment between the employer and that third party. The provision creates a three-party relationship involving the temporary worker, the employment agency or other supplier, and the client where the work is performed. The supplier remains the legal employer even though the client directs the daily work.

2. Supervision and Direction

A central requirement is that the worker performs the work under the supervision and direction of the client.

Relevant circumstances may include who determines:

  • the worker’s tasks and priorities;

  • working hours and schedules;

  • the place of work;

  • operational instructions;

  • working methods; and

  • assessment of the worker’s performance.

Toelichting

The important question is who directs the worker’s daily activities. If the client controls the work, this may indicate temporary-agency employment.

3. Care4Care and the Allocation Function

In the Care4Care judgment, the Supreme Court held that Article 7:690 BW is not limited to traditional temporary-employment agencies that match workers with temporary vacancies.

A separate labour-market allocation function is not required. Payroll, secondment and other suppliers may therefore fall within Article 7:690 BW when the statutory requirements are satisfied.

Toelichting

A company does not escape the temporary-agency rules simply because it calls itself a payroll provider, consultancy or secondment company.

Tijdlijn

Geldig vanaf—
Geldig totDoorlopend

Article 7:690 BW

Gepland:—
Werkelijk:—
NotitieThe statutory definition of the temporary-agency employment contract enters into force.

Care4Care judgment

Gepland:—
Werkelijk:—
NotitieThe Supreme Court confirms that a traditional labour-market allocation function is not required. ECLI:NL:HR:2016:2356.

Bronnen

Bekijk alle kennis
Netherlands

YoungOnes Workers at H&M – Netherlands Labour Authority, 2024

The Netherlands Labour Authority investigated retail workers who performed assignments at H&M through the YoungOnes platform under contracts describing them as independent contractors. According to FNV’s publication of the findings, the Authority concluded that the workers were not genuinely self-employed. H&M supervised and directed their work, while YoungOnes organised the contractual and administrative structure through which they were supplied to H&M. The relationship therefore displayed the characteristics of temporary-agency employment under Article 7:690 BW. YoungOnes disputed the assessment, arguing that workers could choose assignments, work for different clients and bear entrepreneurial risk. The Authority’s assessment is an administrative enforcement finding and should not be presented as a judicial ruling.

Netherlands

NV / Helpling – Amsterdam District Court, 01.07.2019 ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2019:4546

The Amsterdam District Court held that cleaners working through Helpling did not have employment contracts or temporary-agency agreements with the platform. The Court found that Helpling actively organised access to cleaning assignments but did not exercise sufficient authority over how the cleaning work was performed. Instead, the cleaners had employment relationships with the private households under the domestic-services regime. However, Helpling qualified as an employment intermediary under the Waadi. It was therefore prohibited from charging cleaners commission for helping them obtain work.

Netherlands

FNV & CNV v Temper – Amsterdam Court of Appeal, 16.06.2026 ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:1612

The Amsterdam Court of Appeal held that workers who performed assignments through Temper had temporary-agency employment contracts with Temper under Article 7:690 BW. The Court found that Temper was more than a neutral digital marketplace. It organised the contractual structure, controlled access to assignments, influenced remuneration and payment, and established the rules governing the relationship. The clients exercised practical supervision during assignments, while Temper retained the formal employer role. The judgment reversed the Amsterdam District Court’s 2024 decision, which had concluded that no temporary-agency agreements existed.

Netherlands

Waadi – Allocation of Workers by Intermediaries

The Waadi regulates the supply of workers by intermediaries. It generally applies when a supplier makes individuals available to a client in return for payment and those individuals work under the client’s supervision and direction. The legislation contains obligations concerning supplier registration, working conditions, recruitment charges, restrictions on workers moving to clients and the use of supplied workers during strikes. Depending on the provision and the facts, obligations may apply to the supplier, the client or both.