Naar inhoud
Terug naar Knowledge Catalog
Indonesia

How does PMK No. 168 of 2023 regulate tax withholding for freelancers?

Gepubliceerd op:

Minister of Finance Regulation No. 168 of 2023 regulates withholding tax on income received by individuals in connection with work, services or activities. The Regulation covers several categories of income recipient, including employees, non-employees, pension recipients, former employees and participants in activities. An individual freelancer providing services may fall within the Bukan Pegawai, or non-employee, category. For payments to a non-employee, PPh Article 21 is generally calculated by applying the progressive personal income-tax rates to 50% of the relevant gross remuneration. This withholding treatment does not conclusively determine the person’s employment status. Tax classification and employment classification remain separate legal assessments.

1. Who is treated as a non-employee?

PMK No. 168 of 2023 defines a Bukan Pegawai as an individual, other than a permanent or temporary employee, who receives income under any name or in any form for providing services.

The non-employee category includes individuals providing professional or personal services, such as:

  • experts and professional advisers;

  • artists and entertainers;

  • athletes;

  • trainers, instructors and speakers;

  • presenters and moderators;

  • authors, researchers and translators;

  • advertising service providers;

  • project supervisors and managers;

  • intermediaries;

  • insurance agents; and

  • distributors engaged in multilevel marketing, direct selling or similar activities.

The category may therefore include an individual freelancer who independently performs services under an Assignment.

Toelichting

A freelancer may be treated as a non-employee for tax-withholding purposes when receiving remuneration for independently provided services.

2. How is PPh Article 21 calculated for a non-employee?

For income received by a non-employee, the PPh Article 21 withholding amount is generally calculated by applying the progressive personal income-tax rates to:

  • 50% of the gross income received or earned during the relevant tax period.

The Regulation no longer applies different calculation methods depending on whether the non-employee receives remuneration continuously or intermittently.

The applicable calculation concerns withholding at the time of payment. It does not necessarily represent the Vendor’s final annual income-tax liability.

Toelichting

For qualifying service payments, the withholding calculation generally begins with half of the freelancer’s relevant gross remuneration.

3. Who must withhold PPh Article 21?

PMK No. 168 identifies the parties that may qualify as PPh Article 21 withholding agents. These include:

  • employers;

  • government agencies;

  • pension funds or other bodies paying pensions or similar income;

  • entities paying remuneration for services or activities; and

  • organisers of activities.

Whether a particular Client must withhold tax depends on:

  • the Client’s legal and tax status;

  • the identity of the Vendor;

  • whether the Vendor is an individual or a legal entity;

  • the Vendor’s tax residence;

  • the nature of the services;

  • which party legally pays or owes the remuneration; and

  • whether another withholding provision applies.

Toelichting

The party legally responsible for paying the individual Vendor may also be responsible for deducting and reporting PPh Article 21.

4. Does PPh Article 21 apply to every Vendor?

The non-employee rules under PMK No. 168 principally concern payments to qualifying individuals.

Different tax treatment may apply where:

  • the Vendor is a company or another legal entity;

  • the Vendor is not an Indonesian tax resident;

  • the payment falls under another withholding-tax provision;

  • the income is subject to final tax; or

  • a tax treaty affects the treatment of a cross-border payment.

The Client must therefore identify the Vendor’s legal form and tax residence before determining the correct withholding treatment.

Toelichting

An individual freelancer and an incorporated Vendor are not automatically taxed in the same way.

5. Does non-employee tax treatment prove independent status?

Treating an individual as a non-employee for PPh Article 21 purposes does not conclusively establish that the person is an independent freelancer under employment law.

Employment risk may remain where the relationship involves:

  • continuing personal work;

  • regular wage-like remuneration;

  • Client orders or operational instructions;

  • mandatory working hours;

  • internal supervision; or

  • organisational integration.

Conversely, the deduction of PPh Article 21 does not by itself transform a genuine independent service relationship into employment.

Toelichting

Tax withholding and employment classification answer different legal questions. Correctly withholding tax does not remove the need to assess how the working relationship operates.

6. What documentation supports the withholding calculation?

Relevant documentation may include:

  • the Direct Client–Vendor Service Agreement;

  • the relevant Assignment;

  • the Vendor’s identity and tax information;

  • evidence of the Vendor’s legal form;

  • tax-residence information;

  • invoices or payment requests;

  • evidence of the services provided;

  • the gross remuneration;

  • the withholding calculation;

  • the withholding certificate; and

  • payment records.

Toelichting

The payer requires sufficient information to identify the Vendor, classify the payment and calculate the appropriate withholding.

Tijdlijn

Geldig vanaf—
Geldig totDoorlopend

PMK No. 168 of 2023 adoption

Gepland:—
Werkelijk:—

Bronnen

Bekijk alle kennis
Indonesia

How are employment-status disputes resolved under Indonesia’s Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Law?

Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement establishes the procedures for resolving disputes arising from an employment relationship. The Law recognises four categories of industrial relations dispute: disputes over rights; disputes over interests; employment-termination disputes; and disputes between trade unions within the same company. The parties must ordinarily attempt to resolve the dispute through bipartite negotiations before involving the competent manpower authority or bringing proceedings before the Industrial Relations Court. Where a freelancer claims that the practical relationship was actually employment, the existence of an employment relationship may become a preliminary issue. If employment is established, claims concerning statutory employment rights or termination may proceed through the dispute-settlement framework established by this Law.

Indonesia

How does Indonesia’s BPJS Law provide social-security coverage for freelancers?

Law No. 24 of 2011 concerning Social Security Administrative Bodies establishes Indonesia’s two principal social-security bodies: BPJS Kesehatan, which administers health-security coverage; and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, which administers employment-related social-security programmes. The Law applies within Indonesia’s broader compulsory social-security framework. Employees are generally registered through their employers, while individuals working independently may participate under the Bukan Penerima Upah, or non-wage recipient worker, category. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan expressly identifies freelancers as individuals who may participate in this category. The available employment-related programmes for non-wage recipient workers generally include work-accident, death and old-age protection. Registration as a non-wage recipient worker is relevant to social-security administration but does not conclusively determine whether the person is genuinely independent under employment law.

Indonesia

How does Indonesia distinguish employees from independent contractors?

Indonesian law does not establish one exhaustive statutory checklist for distinguishing employees from independent contractors. The principal starting point is Article 1(15) of the Manpower Law, which identifies three elements of an employment relationship: work; wages; and orders. The decisive issue is whether the relationship, considered as a whole, contains these elements. The contractual label is relevant evidence, but calling someone a “freelancer”, “consultant”, “partner” or “Vendor” does not by itself determine their legal status. Indonesia does not expressly codify a general doctrine called the “substance-over-contract test” for worker classification. However, a substance-focused analysis follows from comparing the parties’ written agreement with how the work is actually organised.

Indonesia

How does the Indonesian Civil Code regulate independent service agreements?

The Indonesian Civil Code provides the general contractual basis for independent services and contracts for work. Article 1601 distinguishes between: employment agreements; contracts for work; and agreements to provide other services. Article 1601a describes employment as work performed in the service of another party, for wages and during a certain period. Article 1601b concerns an agreement under which a contractor undertakes to complete specified work for an agreed price. The distinction is important for freelancers. An independent agreement should concern a service, task or deliverable performed under the Vendor’s own organisation. Where the Client exercises employer-like authority over the working process, the Manpower Law may apply instead.