How can Belgium’s Administrative Commission determine a Freelancer’s employment status?
Published on:
Belgium’s Administrative Commission for the Regulation of the Employment Relationship provides a procedure through which parties can obtain an assessment of whether their relationship should be classified as employment or self-employment. The Commission may issue: a non-binding opinion concerning the appropriate classification; or a decision that is binding on specified Belgian social-security and employment authorities. The Commission examines the parties’ agreement and how the relationship operates in practice. Its assessment is based on the general classification criteria established by the Programme Law of 27 December 2006 and, where applicable, statutory presumptions applying to particular sectors or platform work. The procedure can give a Freelancer and Client greater certainty, but it does not permit them to choose a classification that conflicts with the practical reality of their relationship.
1. What can the Administrative Commission issue?
The Administrative Commission may assess whether a working relationship corresponds to:
an employment relationship performed under the authority of an employer; or
an independent professional relationship performed without employment-law authority.
The Commission may issue an opinion or a decision.
An opinion provides the Commission’s assessment of the relationship but is consultative and does not bind the parties, courts or public authorities.
A decision has a stronger legal effect. It is binding on the public bodies specified by law, including the competent Belgian employment and social-security authorities, provided that:
the facts supplied to the Commission were complete and accurate;
the relationship continues to operate under the conditions examined by the Commission; and
no material change subsequently affects those conditions.
The Commission does not replace the labour courts. Its decisions remain subject to judicial review.
Explanation
A Freelancer or Client can ask the Commission to assess whether their relationship is genuinely independent or should be treated as employment. They can request guidance through an opinion or seek a decision carrying a stronger legal effect.
2. Who may apply and when?
One or both parties to the proposed or existing relationship may apply to the Commission, subject to the statutory conditions.
An application may generally be submitted:
before the working relationship begins;
within one year after the relationship begins; or
within one year after a new fact or material change arises that may affect its classification.
The Commission cannot normally consider the application if:
an administrative or criminal investigation into the status of the relationship is already underway;
proceedings concerning the classification have already been brought before a court; or
a court has already made a final determination concerning the relationship.
For the Commission to issue a decision concerning an existing relationship, that relationship must still exist when the Commission examines the application.
An application should clearly identify the relevant Freelancer, Client and Assignment. A general description of how the parties usually work may be insufficient where the practical conditions differ between Assignments.
Explanation
The procedure is designed mainly to clarify status before a dispute arises. The parties should therefore apply before or shortly after starting the Assignment, or after an important change in how the work is organised.
3. How does the Commission assess the relationship?
The Commission examines the information supplied in the application and the supporting documents. It may request additional information and may hear the parties where this is necessary.
Relevant evidence may include:
the Direct Client–Freelancer Service Agreement;
the individual Assignment;
statements of work and deliverables;
invoices and payment records;
communications and operational instructions;
working-time or availability arrangements;
reporting and supervision requirements;
evidence of substitution or the personal performance of work;
information about commercial and financial risk;
evidence of work for other Clients;
access to the Client’s internal systems or workplace; and
information concerning the termination of the relationship.
The Commission applies the four general statutory criteria:
the parties’ expressed intention, provided it corresponds to the practical relationship;
freedom to organise working time;
freedom to organise the work; and
the possibility of hierarchical control.
Where a sectoral or platform-work presumption applies, the Commission must also examine the specific statutory factors governing that presumption.
The Commission normally issues its decision within three months. This period may be extended where additional documents or information are requested.
Explanation
The Commission does not decide status solely from the name of the contract. It considers how the Freelancer actually performs the Assignment, including who controls the work, the schedule and the organisation of the services.
4. What effect does the outcome have, and can it be challenged?
An opinion is sent to the applicant and remains consultative.
If an opinion concludes that the relationship should be reclassified, the applicant must notify the other party by registered mail within 30 days. That notification may open a new period during which the other party, or both parties jointly, can request a formal decision.
A decision is notified to all parties. It is also communicated to the public institutions specified by law and is published in anonymised form.
The decision binds the competent administrative authorities, including the relevant employment and social-security institutions. However, its binding effect may cease if:
the parties supplied incomplete or incorrect information;
the relationship does not operate as described; or
the factual conditions subsequently change.
A reclassification decision by the Commission generally operates prospectively. The decision may be transmitted to the competent social-security institutions so that the necessary regularisation can be undertaken.
A party may challenge the decision before the competent labour tribunal within one month following notification. An appeal does not automatically suspend the decision, although the party may ask the tribunal to order suspension.
Explanation
A formal decision offers greater certainty, but it only protects the parties while the facts remain the same as those presented to the Commission. Either party can ask a labour tribunal to review the decision.
Sources
Related knowledge
View all knowledgeWhat are the consequences of Freelancer misclassification in Belgium?
Belgian law distinguishes an employee from a genuinely self-employed Freelancer by examining how the relationship operates in practice. Where a person is presented as self-employed but works under an employer’s authority, the relationship may be reclassified as employment. Reclassification may arise through: a decision of the Administrative Commission for the Regulation of the Employment Relationship; a social-security investigation; a labour-inspection investigation; proceedings brought by the National Social Security Office; proceedings initiated by a worker or trade union; or a judgment of a labour tribunal or labour court of appeal. The consequences depend on who makes the determination, the procedure used, the relevant period and the claims presented. They may include retroactive social-security contributions, employee registration, unpaid remuneration, holiday pay, employment benefits and penalties for non-compliance. A decision of the Administrative Commission generally operates only for the future. Court proceedings or enforcement investigations may address an earlier period, subject to the applicable limitation rules and procedural requirements.
How did the Brussels Labour Court of Appeal classify an Uber driver?
In its judgment of 13 June 2025, the Brussels Labour Court of Appeal held that an Uber driver working in the Brussels-Capital Region performed his services under an employment relationship with Uber B.V. and the Belgian Platform Rider Association. The driver had initially asked Belgium’s Administrative Commission for the Regulation of the Employment Relationship to determine his status. In 2020, the Commission concluded that the practical working arrangements were incompatible with self-employment. Uber and the Belgian Platform Rider Association challenged that decision. The French-speaking Brussels Labour Tribunal ruled in their favour on 21 December 2022 and classified the relationship as independent. The driver and the National Social Security Office appealed. The Labour Court of Appeal reversed the first-instance judgment. It found that Uber provided an integrated passenger-transport service rather than acting only as a neutral intermediary. The sector-specific employment presumption for the transport of persons for third parties therefore applied. Eight of the nine relevant sectoral criteria indicated employment. The Court also found that the driver lacked genuine freedom to organise his working time and work once connected to the application. Uber’s pricing, ride-allocation, geolocation, rating and access-control systems demonstrated a possibility of hierarchical control.
How did the Brussels Labour Court of Appeal classify Deliveroo couriers?
In its judgment of 21 December 2023, the Brussels Labour Court of Appeal held that the relationship between Deliveroo and the couriers covered by the proceedings had to be reclassified as an employment relationship. The Court found that Deliveroo’s activity fell within the transport-of-goods sector. It therefore applied the sector-specific criteria established under Belgium’s Programme Law of 27 December 2006 and the Royal Decree of 29 October 2013. At least six of the eight sectoral criteria indicating employment were satisfied. This activated a rebuttable presumption of an employment relationship. Deliveroo failed to rebut that presumption when the relationship was assessed against the four general Belgian classification criteria. The Court considered that the couriers’ freedom to decide whether to connect to the application or accept work did not establish genuine independence. Once a delivery was accepted, Deliveroo determined important aspects of how the work was organised, monitored and remunerated. The Court held that the couriers were employees and that Deliveroo was required, in principle, to regularise their position under employment and social-security law. The proceedings concerning the precise financial consequences continued separately.
How will the EU Platform Work Directive affect Freelancer classification in Belgium?
Directive (EU) 2024/2831 establishes minimum EU rules intended to improve the working conditions of people performing work through digital labour platforms. The Directive requires Member States to establish effective procedures for determining whether a person performing platform work has an employment relationship. It also requires a rebuttable legal presumption of employment where facts indicating direction and control are identified under the applicable national law, collective agreements and Court of Justice case law. The Directive does not classify every platform Freelancer as an employee. The relationship must still be assessed under the applicable national legal test. However, where the conditions for the presumption are satisfied, the digital labour platform must demonstrate that the relationship is not an employment relationship. Belgium already introduced a rebuttable employment presumption for certain platform workers through legislation adopted in 2022. Nevertheless, Belgium must assess and, where necessary, amend its framework to comply fully with the Directive, including its scope, procedural rules, data-protection requirements and algorithmic-management protections. The Directive entered into force on 1 December 2024. Member States have until 2 December 2026 to transpose it. The latest Belgian official materials identified for this review continued to refer to a future transposition law and interdepartmental implementation work. The Directive should therefore not yet be presented as fully implemented in Belgian law.