Skip to content
Back to News

What is an FMS operator?

Published on:
Article image: What is an FMS operator?

An FMS operator combines mediation between clients and freelancers with the administration of assignments through a Freelance Management System. In this model, the client and freelancer contract directly for the work. The operator supports their engagement without becoming the contractor responsible for delivering the assignment.  

A client needs an independent engineer. A business introduces a suitable professional, helps collect the documents and supports the agreement and invoicing. The engineer delivers the services directly to the client.  

The business remains involved throughout the assignment, but it has not employed the engineer or undertaken to deliver the engineering work itself.  

How should that role be described?  

FMS operator provides a useful name. In this article, it means a business that uses a Freelance Management System to connect clients and freelancers and administer their direct engagements. It builds on the mediation role—bemiddeling in Dutch—which Zooly has also described as the broker role.  

The term describes a business model. It is not a new statutory status. 

What services does the operator provide?

For the client, the service can begin with finding a professional and continue through onboarding, agreements and invoicing. For the freelancer, it offers an organised way to present business information, agree assignments and handle the administration. 

Consider an engineering assignment that runs for six months. Before work starts, the parties need to establish the scope, price and responsibilities. During the assignment, documents may expire and changes may require further agreement. The invoice should then reflect the services and approvals on record. 

The operator helps those steps work together. Its own service agreements should explain what it will do, what it charges and which responsibilities remain with the client and freelancer. 

The distinction is between supporting the assignment and undertaking to perform it. In this model, the client buys the engineering services directly from the freelancer. 

How does this differ from intermediary contracting or the supply of personnel?

The SNA standard for freelance intermediary services distinguishes two arrangements. Under bemiddeling, the client and freelancer contract directly. Under tussenkomst—intermediary contracting—the business enters into separate agreements with each party for the assignment. 

The supply of personnel raises another question: are workers being made available, for payment, to work under another party’s supervision and control? This is terbeschikkingstelling, the activity addressed by the Wtta admission system. 

A business providing mediation without making workers available in this way does not need Wtta admission for that mediation activity. If it also supplies personnel, that additional activity requires a separate assessment. 

The familiar Dutch description detacheringsbureau cannot settle the answer either. What matters is how the particular arrangement works. The same principle applies to “FMS operator”: the name is useful only if the agreements and everyday conduct support it. 

Why does the role deserve a clearer name?

The introduction is only part of what clients and freelancers need. They also want documents checked, agreements kept current and questions followed up before they delay an assignment. 

The SNA modules for mediation and intermediary contracting, introduced from January 2026, underline the importance of those business controls. They do not determine the legal classification of each working relationship. 

An FMS helps connect the information behind the service. Instead of leaving a proposal in one inbox and an amended agreement in another, the operator can maintain a coherent record of the engagement. 

That is what the term adds: it describes a mediation business whose service continues beyond making the introduction. 

Can the operator send the freelancer’s invoices?

An operator can send invoices in the freelancer’s name and on their behalf under a mandate. The mandate records which actions the operator is authorised to carry out for the freelancer. 

The freelancer should be able to check what is being sent to the client on their behalf. A clear process for reviewing and approving the invoice helps document that involvement. 

The invoice, agreement and payment arrangements should consistently identify who provided the services, who owes payment and what the operator is authorised to do. 

An invoicing mandate is therefore one part of the arrangement. It does not, by itself, establish the operator’s entire legal position or remove the freelancer’s responsibilities. 

Where does Zooly fit?

Zooly provides the FMS and supporting services. The FMS operator uses that system to deliver its own services. 

An operator can offer its service under its own name. Zooly supports processes such as onboarding, dossier monitoring, moderation, agreements and invoicing. The client and freelancer remain the parties to the agreement for the assignment. 

The intended model supports their connection and administration without taking over direction of the work. Direct contracting alone, however, does not establish that every engagement is independent or settle every regulatory question. The actual service and working arrangements remain decisive. 

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or employment advice. Labor and classification regulations (such as the Dutch Wet DBA and EU directives) are highly complex, fact-specific, and subject to frequent changes and changing administrative policies. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or advisory relationship with Zooly. Before making any decisions regarding contractor engagement, compliance frameworks, or classification policies, you should always consult a qualified local employment lawyer or tax professional. Zooly accepts no liability for any actions taken or decisions made based on the information provided on our website.

Editorial Note & AI Disclosure

In compliance with Article 50 of the EU AI Act, we disclose that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were utilized to assist in compiling, legal screening, and drafting this content. However, to ensure absolute legal precision and contextual accuracy regarding compliance topics, the final text has undergone full human editorial review and rigorous manual verification by the Zooly compliance team before publication.