Skip to content
Back to Knowledge Catalog
Netherlands

Can pseudo-freelancers take on assignments through opting-in?

Published on:

Opting-in is a Dutch tax arrangement for people who carry out paid assignments outside employment without performing those activities as an entrepreneur. In this article, “freelancer” means a genuine independent entrepreneur. “Pseudo-freelancer” describes a person who takes on assignments without their own KVK registration, where registration is not required, and uses opting-in for the activities concerned. The Tax Administration calls a person working under opting-in a “pseudo-employee”. “Pseudo-freelancer” is an explanatory term used in this article, not a statutory classification. This arrangement allows eligible pseudo-freelancers to accept assignments without establishing a registered business solely to obtain a KVK number. The parties jointly choose to have wage tax and specified contributions withheld from the remuneration. An administration company can handle the invoicing, payments and withholding on behalf of the pseudo-freelancer. It performs certain payroll functions without necessarily entering into an employment contract with the pseudo-freelancer. The arrangement does not establish independent status. It does not prevent an employment contract from existing where the actual working relationship meets the legal requirements for employment. For clients and pseudo-freelancers, opting-in can simplify payment administration. It cannot resolve a misclassified working relationship.

1. What is opting-in, and who can use it?

Under the general opting-in rules, a person carrying out paid assignments and their client jointly elect to treat their working relationship as deemed employment for wage tax purposes. 

The arrangement requires that: 

  • the person receives remuneration for the activities; 

  • the relationship is neither actual employment nor an existing deemed employment relationship; and 

  • the person does not perform those activities as an entrepreneur. 

Wage tax, national insurance contributions and the income-related Healthcare Insurance Act contribution are then withheld from the remuneration. 

Explanation

A pseudo-freelancer can accept an assignment without operating as a freelance entrepreneur. Opting-in provides a mechanism for withholding tax from the resulting remuneration. This does not make the pseudo-freelancer an employee under employment law. Nor does it prove that the assignment genuinely falls outside employment.

2. How does opting-in differ from freelance entrepreneurship?

A freelancer, as defined in this article, performs assignments as an independent entrepreneur. The resulting business income is generally accounted for through their own tax administration. The general opting-in election is unavailable for activities performed as an entrepreneur. 

A pseudo-freelancer does not perform the activities covered by opting-in as an entrepreneur. The remuneration is processed through the applicable withholding arrangement. 

A person who works under an employment contract falls within the rules applicable to employment. The parties cannot choose opting-in to avoid those rules. 

Explanation

Freelancers, pseudo-freelancers and employees must not be treated as interchangeable categories. A pseudo-freelancer can take on assignments, but the use of opting-in does not establish entrepreneurial status or provide the employment rights associated with an employment contract.

3. Can a pseudo-freelancer accept assignments without KVK registration?

Yes, where no registration obligation applies and the assignment satisfies the conditions for opting-in. KVK registration is not a condition of the general opting-in election. 

This allows a pseudo-freelancer to accept eligible assignments without establishing a registered business solely to obtain a KVK number. The payment and withholding administration can be arranged directly with the client or through an appropriate administration company. 

Explanation

A person does not always need a registered business to receive payment for an assignment. Opting-in can provide an administrative route for eligible work outside employment and entrepreneurship. However, “no KVK number” is not an employment-status test. It does not establish independence or eligibility for opting-in.

4. How can an administration company administer invoicing and tax withholding?

An administration company can handle invoicing, collect payments and process deductions before transferring the remaining remuneration to the pseudo-freelancer. 

For example, Verloning.nl’s published service rules describe an arrangement in which the person taking on the assignment agrees its conditions with the client. Verloning.nl handles administration and invoicing through a deemed employment arrangement, with tax and Healthcare Insurance Act withholding. 

The applicable service agreement and statutory basis must still be checked: not every arrangement described as “deemed employment” has identical legal consequences. 

Explanation

The client pays the administration company. The administration company processes the payment and deductions, and the pseudo-freelancer receives the remaining amount. The administration company performs certain payroll functions commonly associated with employment. In the arrangement discussed here, it does so without entering into a civil-law employment contract with the pseudo-freelancer.

5. Why does opting-in provide no protection against misclassification?

Employment classification depends on the working relationship as a whole. Relevant circumstances include the organisation of the work, instructions and supervision, personal performance, remuneration, commercial risk and entrepreneurial activity. 

Someone described as a pseudo-freelancer might be paid through an administration company while still working to a compulsory roster, receiving daily managerial instructions and having little commercial freedom. The payment route does not remove those circumstances. 

Explanation

Making tax deductions does not establish that the working relationship has been classified correctly. Clients should examine how the assignment operates. Pseudo-freelancers should check whether they can exercise the independence described in their agreement.

6. Which protections does opting-in provide?

The general opting-in election does not itself provide employee insurance cover under the WW, ZW or WIA. It also does not create statutory rights to paid annual leave, continued wages during sickness or dismissal protection. 

An administration company may offer separate insurance or contractual benefits. Their scope depends on the relevant terms, exclusions and eligibility requirements. 

Explanation

Tax withholding is not income protection. A pseudo-freelancer should establish what happens during illness, disability or a period without assignments. A deduction on a payment statement does not prove that those risks are covered.

7. What should clients and pseudo-freelancers record?

Record why the assignment falls outside employment and why the person carrying it out is eligible for opting-in. Where an administration company is involved, identify its contractual role, the legal basis for withholding and the responsibilities of each party. 

For the general opting-in election, follow the current declaration procedure. The Tax Administration must receive the joint declaration before the first withholding.

Explanation

The engagement file should explain: how the work is organised and who can give instructions; the fee, service charges and deductions; which party handles declarations and payments; what insurance actually covers, including its limits; when changes to the assignment require a fresh classification assessment. An administration company’s recommended hourly rate is not a statutory guarantee of independent status.

8. Key insights and actionable takeaways for clients and pseudo-freelancers

  • Classify the work first. Select the payment arrangement after assessing the actual relationship. 

  • Check eligibility for opting-in separately from KVK registration. Neither follows automatically from the other. 

  • Pseudo-freelancers can accept eligible assignments without KVK registration where no registration obligation applies. 

  • Clients should verify the administration company’s role and retain evidence of how the assignment operates. 

  • Pseudo-freelancers should compare the agreed fee with the amount remaining after service charges and deductions. 

  • Check sickness, disability and unemployment protection separately. 

  • Reassess the relationship when supervision, scheduling or responsibilities change. Tax withholding cannot correct an assignment that operates as employment. 

Sources

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or employment advice. Labor and classification regulations (such as the Dutch Wet DBA and EU directives) are highly complex, fact-specific, and subject to frequent changes and changing administrative policies. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or advisory relationship with Zooly. Before making any decisions regarding contractor engagement, compliance frameworks, or classification policies, you should always consult a qualified local employment lawyer or tax professional. Zooly accepts no liability for any actions taken or decisions made based on the information provided on our website.

Editorial Note & AI Disclosure

In compliance with Article 50 of the EU AI Act, we disclose that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were utilized to assist in compiling, legal screening, and drafting this content. However, to ensure absolute legal precision and contextual accuracy regarding compliance topics, the final text has undergone full human editorial review and rigorous manual verification by the Zooly compliance team before publication.

View all knowledge
Netherlands

Why does price negotiation matter when assessing freelance status?

A freelancer’s ability to propose a price and agree commercial terms can support evidence of entrepreneurship. It does not prove independent status by itself. Dutch courts consider both how remuneration is determined and its level, together with the wider working relationship. This Knowledge Item explains the relevant cases, the distinction between negotiation and accepting an offer, forthcoming legislation and how to preserve a useful record from a freelancer profile and client request through to the service agreement.

Netherlands

When is an all-in price useful for a freelance assignment?

An all-in price can make an assignment easier to budget and reduce disputes about routine expenses. Its legal significance depends on what the price includes and who actually carries the commercial risks. An all-in hourly rate is different from a fixed project price. Neither guarantees freelance status, and separately invoiced costs do not automatically indicate employment. This Knowledge Item explains the relevant law, a recent court example, VAT treatment and the agreements clients and freelancers should record.

Netherlands

When does organisational embedding point to employment?

Organisational embedding, or inbedding, concerns how the work and the person performing it fit into the client’s organisation and business operations. It is a relevant circumstance under current Dutch employment law, but does not decide classification on its own. Collaboration, access to systems and project coordination must be assessed alongside authority, commercial risk and entrepreneurship. This Knowledge Item explains the relevant cases, everyday working arrangements, the proposed Zelfstandigenwet and the evidence clients and freelancers should retain.

Netherlands

When do a freelancer’s tools and subscriptions support independent status?

Buying, leasing or subscribing to business resources can support evidence of entrepreneurship, but ownership alone does not establish freelance status. The relevance depends on the work, the commercial decisions and risks involved, and the relationship as a whole. Client equipment may be appropriate for security, safety or technical reasons. This Knowledge Item explains the relevant cases, the proposed Zelfstandigenwet and how evidence, broker checks and client-facing indicators can be recorded without presenting them as legal certification.