Epicx: what happens when a freelancer is an employee?
Published on:
A professional who invoiced Epicx through her sole proprietorship was legally an employee from 1 April 2017. Her administrative work formed a continuing part of the organisation. She received a fixed monthly payment, had limited commercial risk and could not freely arrange a substitute. The consequences extended beyond employment status. The court annulled Epicx’s termination, awarded continued salary and holiday allowance, and ordered retrospective payroll returns. It subsequently dissolved the employment contract with effect from 1 December 2025 and awarded a statutory transition payment. The judgment also addressed the financial starting point: the agreed freelance fee, excluding VAT, became the gross salary in this case. The worker’s request to treat that fee as net salary and increase it through grossing up was rejected. uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl For freelancers and clients, the case shows why classification must be assessed during the relationship. A mistaken classification can affect years of payments and the legal route required to end the work.
1. Why did the administrative assignment qualify as employment?
The worker had previously provided tennis lessons as a self-employed instructor to another company. After those activities ended, she began performing administrative and operational tasks for Epicx, an indoor activity centre.
Her responsibilities included managing the mailbox, processing bookings, preparing staff rosters and answering personnel questions. From April 2017, the parties agreed a fixed monthly fee for 100 hours. Payment continued during holidays, with a separate agreement for payment during sickness.
She had some freedom over where and when she worked. The court nevertheless found that she worked within Epicx’s organisational structure, performed the work personally and had no relevant entrepreneurial investment or commercial risk.
Explanation
Someone can run a business and still be an employee in a particular working relationship. The earlier tennis activities did not determine the status of the later administrative work. That required its own assessment. Continuing to invoice through the same business did not preserve self-employed status automatically.
2. Why did working from home and invoicing fail to establish independence?
The worker increasingly worked from home after the pandemic. She could perform many tasks without daily supervision. She also issued invoices with VAT and declared the income herself.
The court weighed those circumstances against her continuing duties, expected availability, scheduled services and place within the organisation. Her ability to work independently did not remove the structure within which she had to perform the work.
Explanation
Practical freedom matters. Its scope matters more. Choosing the location or timing of some work does not necessarily mean that a person controls an independent business. The assessment must also address who determines the responsibilities, required availability and continuity of the service.
3. Did the fee become gross or net salary?
The worker argued that her invoiced fee should be treated as net salary and grossed up. The court rejected that approach.
It used the fee excluding VAT as the gross salary. The final monthly amount was €1,800 gross. The court considered the parties’ payment arrangements, the worker’s responsibility for income tax and remuneration in an equivalent position.
Explanation
A freelance payment does not automatically become the amount someone must take home after payroll deductions. For Clients, this affects the calculation of potential liability. For Freelancers, it affects the value of a claim. The agreed fee, gross salary, net pay, holiday allowance and employer costs are different figures.
4. Why did ending the assignment create a continuing salary obligation?
Epicx gave notice on 21 May 2024 to end the relationship on 1 August 2024. Once the court recognised an employment contract, that termination had to satisfy employment law.
It did not. The worker had not consented, and the statutory conditions permitting the termination were absent.
The court annulled the notice and awarded:
€1,800 gross monthly salary from 1 August 2024 until 1 December 2025;
8% holiday allowance over that salary;
€10,760 gross in holiday allowance arrears for the earlier period, together with statutory interest and specified costs.
The employment contract was separately dissolved from 1 December 2025 because the working relationship had seriously broken down. A €5,618 gross transition payment was awarded.
Explanation
Stopping an assignment does not necessarily stop the payment obligation. If the person is legally an employee, giving the contractual freelance notice period may be insufficient. Salary can continue after the date on which the client believed the relationship had ended.
5. What happened to payroll returns and previously paid invoices?
Epicx was ordered to submit payroll returns for 2017–2024, separately for each relevant period, within six weeks after formal service of the decision. The order carried a daily penalty for non-compliance.
Epicx also sought crediting and repayment of previously paid invoices. The court referred that claim to the commercial division for consideration through a summons procedure. It did not decide that Epicx was entitled to repayment.
Explanation
Payments already made, salary entitlement, payroll deductions, employer contributions and VAT treatment must be examined together. Simply reclaiming every invoice or paying the same historical remuneration again would overlook unresolved accounting and legal questions.
6. What should freelancers and clients learn from Epicx?
The most useful review point is a change in the work. A professional may move from providing a separate service into a continuing internal role while the invoicing arrangement stays the same.
Assess the relationship again when responsibilities expand, guaranteed hours become established or the professional takes over duties previously performed by employees.
Explanation
Public Explanation Keep evidence of how the work operates: Who determines the tasks and required availability? How is the fee negotiated, and what does it cover? Can a substitute actually perform the work? Record commercial investment and exposure to loss. Explain how the Assignment fits within the professional’s wider business. A company laptop or staff meeting is not decisive by itself. The file should explain the whole relationship.
7. Actionable compliance takeaways
Reassess status when the work changes.
Examine fixed hours, continued payment during absence and the allocation of commercial risk together.
Document the meaning of the agreed remuneration.
Review classification before terminating a disputed freelance relationship.
If reclassification occurs, reconcile employment claims and tax corrections before calculating the final financial position.
Sources
- https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2025:17702&
- https://www.avdr.nl/jurisprudentie/rechtbank-den-haag-24-september-2025/?
- https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0005290/#Boek7_Titeldeel10_Afdeling1_Artikel610
- https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2023:443&utm_source=chatgpt.com
- https://www.hogeraad.nl/actueel/nieuwsoverzicht/2025/februari/hoge-raad-beoordeling-sprake-arbeidsovereenkomst-geldt-rangorde-tussen/?
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or employment advice. Labor and classification regulations (such as the Dutch Wet DBA and EU directives) are highly complex, fact-specific, and subject to frequent changes and changing administrative policies. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or advisory relationship with Zooly. Before making any decisions regarding contractor engagement, compliance frameworks, or classification policies, you should always consult a qualified local employment lawyer or tax professional. Zooly accepts no liability for any actions taken or decisions made based on the information provided on our website.
Editorial Note & AI Disclosure
In compliance with Article 50 of the EU AI Act, we disclose that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were utilized to assist in compiling, legal screening, and drafting this content. However, to ensure absolute legal precision and contextual accuracy regarding compliance topics, the final text has undergone full human editorial review and rigorous manual verification by the Zooly compliance team before publication.
Related knowledge
View all knowledgeWhy does price negotiation matter when assessing freelance status?
A freelancer’s ability to propose a price and agree commercial terms can support evidence of entrepreneurship. It does not prove independent status by itself. Dutch courts consider both how remuneration is determined and its level, together with the wider working relationship. This Knowledge Item explains the relevant cases, the distinction between negotiation and accepting an offer, forthcoming legislation and how to preserve a useful record from a freelancer profile and client request through to the service agreement.
When is an all-in price useful for a freelance assignment?
An all-in price can make an assignment easier to budget and reduce disputes about routine expenses. Its legal significance depends on what the price includes and who actually carries the commercial risks. An all-in hourly rate is different from a fixed project price. Neither guarantees freelance status, and separately invoiced costs do not automatically indicate employment. This Knowledge Item explains the relevant law, a recent court example, VAT treatment and the agreements clients and freelancers should record.
When does organisational embedding point to employment?
Organisational embedding, or inbedding, concerns how the work and the person performing it fit into the client’s organisation and business operations. It is a relevant circumstance under current Dutch employment law, but does not decide classification on its own. Collaboration, access to systems and project coordination must be assessed alongside authority, commercial risk and entrepreneurship. This Knowledge Item explains the relevant cases, everyday working arrangements, the proposed Zelfstandigenwet and the evidence clients and freelancers should retain.
When do a freelancer’s tools and subscriptions support independent status?
Buying, leasing or subscribing to business resources can support evidence of entrepreneurship, but ownership alone does not establish freelance status. The relevance depends on the work, the commercial decisions and risks involved, and the relationship as a whole. Client equipment may be appropriate for security, safety or technical reasons. This Knowledge Item explains the relevant cases, the proposed Zelfstandigenwet and how evidence, broker checks and client-facing indicators can be recorded without presenting them as legal certification.