Skip to content
Back to News

Does a broker need Wtta admission?

Published on:
Updated on:
Article image: Does a broker need Wtta admission?

A broker that only brings clients and independent freelancers together does not need Wtta admission for that activity. The admission requirement concerns the supply of workers who work under another party’s supervision and direction. Once the broker’s activity is clear, the next question is which SNA module, if any, is relevant.

What activity does the Wtta regulate?

The Wet toelating terbeschikkingstelling van arbeidskrachten (Wtta) introduces an admission system for businesses that supply workers. Its scope centres on terbeschikkingstelling (making workers available under another party’s supervision and control), for remuneration. 

Temporary employment agencies, secondment businesses and payroll companies are familiar examples. But the business name is not decisive: other businesses can also perform this activity. The official explanation of the Wtta describes the activity that brings a business within the system. 

This is why “we work with freelancers” is not enough to settle the question. The arrangements and working relationship need to support that description. 

How do mediation, intermediary contracting and worker supply differ?

With mediation (bemiddeling), the broker introduces the parties. The client and freelancer enter into their own service agreement, and the freelancer performs the assignment independently. The broker may also provide administrative support. 

With intermediary contracting (tussenkomst), the business contracts separately with the client and the freelancer. That makes it a contracting party on both sides. It does not, on its own, establish that workers are being supplied. 

These are the arrangements distinguished in the SNA standard for freelance services. Whether a particular arrangement amounts to worker supply still requires its own assessment. 

The important question is therefore what happens during the assignment. A direct contract does not settle every legal issue, and separate contracts do not automatically create an admission obligation.

When does the SNA module matter?

Only once the business has established that it needs admission. 

The SNA scheme distinguishes module 2 for worker supply, module 4 for mediation and module 5 for intermediary contracting. These cover different activities and are not interchangeable. 

For the temporary admission route based on an SNA certificate, the certificate must cover worker supply and be valid on 30 June 2027. Applications run from 1 May to 30 June 2027. This route removes the need to submit a separate inspection report for that application; the other admission conditions remain. 

A mediation-only certificate does not meet that condition. Equally, a business that only mediates does not need to obtain module 2 simply because this route exists. 

What should a broker look at first?

Start with a real assignment. Who contracts with whom? What service does the broker undertake to provide? Who decides how the work is carried out, and do the written agreements reflect daily practice? 

The DeepSeek draft’s distinction is useful here, but one point needs care: a broker remaining in the background does not prove that the arrangement is mediation. The client’s supervision and control must also be considered. 

A business offering both mediation and worker supply should examine those activities separately. An admission obligation arising from worker supply should not be confused with the position of its mediation service. 

Which dates matter?

The Wtta takes effect on 1 January 2027, with enforcement of the admission requirement starting on 1 January 2028. Existing worker-supply businesses can register for the transition arrangements between 1 November and 31 December 2026, followed by an application in May–June 2027, subject to the applicable conditions. The government timetable sets out these stages. 

For a broker providing mediation alone, the starting point remains simpler: establish and explain what the business actually does. If it does not perform terbeschikkingstelling, it does not need Wtta admission for its mediation activity. 

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or employment advice. Labor and classification regulations (such as the Dutch Wet DBA and EU directives) are highly complex, fact-specific, and subject to frequent changes and changing administrative policies. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or advisory relationship with Zooly. Before making any decisions regarding contractor engagement, compliance frameworks, or classification policies, you should always consult a qualified local employment lawyer or tax professional. Zooly accepts no liability for any actions taken or decisions made based on the information provided on our website.

Editorial Note & AI Disclosure

In compliance with Article 50 of the EU AI Act, we disclose that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were utilized to assist in compiling, legal screening, and drafting this content. However, to ensure absolute legal precision and contextual accuracy regarding compliance topics, the final text has undergone full human editorial review and rigorous manual verification by the Zooly compliance team before publication.

When does charging a freelancer for access to work breach Dutch law?

An intermediary deducted 3.5% from a freelancer’s pay for arranging an assignment. The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal held that the fee breached Dutch law. The case shows why intermediaries and marketplace operators need to look at what the fee buys and how the assignment works in practice.

What should clients check before engaging freelancers in 2027?

Preparing for 2027 starts with understanding how your freelance arrangements work today. This guide helps clients identify what to check, which questions need a closer look and what to resolve before approving or renewing an assignment. The budget is approved, the freelancer is available and last year’s agreement is ready to reuse. Before signing, ask one more question: does the proposed arrangement still make sense as freelance work? Start by comparing the agreement with how the work will actually be done. Have the duties changed? Who will direct the work? If an intermediary is involved, what will it be responsible for? The checks below help you spot what needs a closer look before you sign.

What is an FMS operator?

An FMS operator combines mediation between clients and freelancers with the administration of assignments through a Freelance Management System. In this model, the client and freelancer contract directly for the work. The operator supports their engagement without becoming the contractor responsible for delivering the assignment. A client needs an independent engineer. A business introduces a suitable professional, helps collect the documents and supports the agreement and invoicing. The engineer delivers the services directly to the client. The business remains involved throughout the assignment, but it has not employed the engineer or undertaken to deliver the engineering work itself. How should that role be described? FMS operator provides a useful name. In this article, it means a business that uses a Freelance Management System to connect clients and freelancers and administer their direct engagements. It builds on the mediation role—bemiddeling in Dutch—which Zooly has also described as the broker role. The term describes a business model. It is not a new statutory status.

Can a professional cyclist be self-employed while taking orders from a team director?

“Close the gap before the climb.” Imagine hearing that in your earpiece with a teammate on your wheel. The team director has spotted a move up the road, and you have seconds to respond. The instruction tells you what the team needs in that moment. To understand the rider’s working relationship, it helps to look at what happens after the finish. The men’s WorldTour rules allow teams to engage self-employed riders where the applicable law permits it, and they set conditions for pay and insurance. So who sets the rider’s training schedule between races? Can the rider negotiate an extra commitment? Who bears the cost if an injury keeps them off the bike? Together, those details help show how much independence the rider has in practice and who carries the financial risk. UCI Road Regulations, Article 2.15.115 bis