Internet consultation of the Platform Work Act

Interested parties can respond to the Platform Work bill until August 24 via the government's internet consultation page.
What is the plan in the Netherlands regarding the introduction of the Platform Work Act?
Member states are obliged to transpose the European Platform Work Directive (Directive 2024/2831) into national legislation by December 2, 2026 at the latest.
The Netherlands is lagging behind this schedule.
What is the purpose of the Platform Work Act?
The aim of the new law is to improve the position of the "employee" who performs platform work by introducing measures that:
Prevent misclassification of the employment relationship;
Set requirements for the protection of the personal data of persons who perform platform work perform;
Set requirements for the use of algorithms, such as “transparency” and “human oversight”;
Set requirements for data portability.
What does the Platform Work Act understand by a "platform"?
The Platform Work Act defines a digital labor platform as a natural or legal person that provides a commercial service. This service must meet four requirements:
The service is provided via a website, a mobile application or an online portal;
The service is initiated because a customer requests it;
The service consists of work performed by individuals for payment;
Using the digital labor platform uses algorithms to assign work, track performance, calculate rates or monitor workers.
The purpose of the Platform Work Act: combating bogus self-employment
The Platform Work Act introduces a legal presumption that a platform worker is an "employee", if there are actual signals of 'management and supervision'.
The new law designates the "platform" as the presumed employer.
The new law also states that the platform must prove that there is no employment relationship. The burden of proof has therefore been reversed: it is not the employee but the platform that must prove that there is no employment relationship. The client for whom the work is carried out is not the party that is regarded as the employer; it is purely about the relationship with the platform.
It is therefore not about what is in the contract between the platform and the freelancer. The "pseudo" freelancer can argue - if there is management and supervision - that he is an employee, and is therefore entitled to a pension, severance pay, etc. since his appointment. If the platform cannot prove the contrary, this also means that the platform must pay payroll tax retroactively and can expect a fine from the Tax Authorities.
What is the legal presumption of platform employment?
In the bill, the legal presumption of platform employment is determined by the following five criteria of management and supervision:
The platform determines the rates;
The platform distributes the work;
The platform controls the quality and the work;
The platform limits the freedom to set your own working hours to choose, refuse assignments or work for third parties;
The platform imposes rules on how the work must be carried out.
If a platform worker demonstrates that at least two of these five criteria are met, the legal presumption that the worker is an employee applies, even if the employee is a "freelancer" hired.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is for informational purposes only and reflects the personal opinions of the author. This is not legal advice. If you have a specific legal problem, always consult a qualified lawyer or attorney.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or employment advice. Labor and classification regulations (such as the Dutch Wet DBA and EU directives) are highly complex, fact-specific, and subject to frequent changes and changing administrative policies. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or advisory relationship with Zooly. Before making any decisions regarding contractor engagement, compliance frameworks, or classification policies, you should always consult a qualified local employment lawyer or tax professional. Zooly accepts no liability for any actions taken or decisions made based on the information provided on our website.
Editorial Note & AI Disclosure:
In compliance with Article 50 of the EU AI Act, we disclose that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were utilized to assist in compiling, legal screening, and drafting this content. However, to ensure absolute legal precision and contextual accuracy regarding compliance topics, the final text has undergone full human editorial review and rigorous manual verification by the Zooly compliance team before publication.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or employment advice. Labor and classification regulations (such as the Dutch Wet DBA and EU directives) are highly complex, fact-specific, and subject to frequent changes and changing administrative policies. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or advisory relationship with Zooly. Before making any decisions regarding contractor engagement, compliance frameworks, or classification policies, you should always consult a qualified local employment lawyer or tax professional. Zooly accepts no liability for any actions taken or decisions made based on the information provided on our website.
Editorial Note & AI Disclosure
In compliance with Article 50 of the EU AI Act, we disclose that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were utilized to assist in compiling, legal screening, and drafting this content. However, to ensure absolute legal precision and contextual accuracy regarding compliance topics, the final text has undergone full human editorial review and rigorous manual verification by the Zooly compliance team before publication.
More News
View all news →An intermediary deducted 3.5% from a freelancer’s pay for arranging an assignment. The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal held that the fee breached Dutch law. The case shows why intermediaries and marketplace operators need to look at what the fee buys and how the assignment works in practice.
Preparing for 2027 starts with understanding how your freelance arrangements work today. This guide helps clients identify what to check, which questions need a closer look and what to resolve before approving or renewing an assignment. The budget is approved, the freelancer is available and last year’s agreement is ready to reuse. Before signing, ask one more question: does the proposed arrangement still make sense as freelance work? Start by comparing the agreement with how the work will actually be done. Have the duties changed? Who will direct the work? If an intermediary is involved, what will it be responsible for? The checks below help you spot what needs a closer look before you sign.
An FMS operator combines mediation between clients and freelancers with the administration of assignments through a Freelance Management System. In this model, the client and freelancer contract directly for the work. The operator supports their engagement without becoming the contractor responsible for delivering the assignment. A client needs an independent engineer. A business introduces a suitable professional, helps collect the documents and supports the agreement and invoicing. The engineer delivers the services directly to the client. The business remains involved throughout the assignment, but it has not employed the engineer or undertaken to deliver the engineering work itself. How should that role be described? FMS operator provides a useful name. In this article, it means a business that uses a Freelance Management System to connect clients and freelancers and administer their direct engagements. It builds on the mediation role—bemiddeling in Dutch—which Zooly has also described as the broker role. The term describes a business model. It is not a new statutory status.
“Close the gap before the climb.” Imagine hearing that in your earpiece with a teammate on your wheel. The team director has spotted a move up the road, and you have seconds to respond. The instruction tells you what the team needs in that moment. To understand the rider’s working relationship, it helps to look at what happens after the finish. The men’s WorldTour rules allow teams to engage self-employed riders where the applicable law permits it, and they set conditions for pay and insurance. So who sets the rider’s training schedule between races? Can the rider negotiate an extra commitment? Who bears the cost if an injury keeps them off the bike? Together, those details help show how much independence the rider has in practice and who carries the financial risk. UCI Road Regulations, Article 2.15.115 bis